How and the extent of the impact of social developments on political thought, especially political jurisprudence, and especially an issue such as velayat-e-faqih, is an important and controversial issue, and of course, it has different opinions, especially about a personality like Sheikh Ansari. The article aims to investigate this issue (goal), based on Skinner's intentional hermeneutics (method) in response to the question of the extent of the impact of the Iran-Russia wars on Sheikh Ansari's political jurisprudence; It deals with the design and development of this hypothesis that the wars between Iran and Russia, as the biggest social and political development of that time, in which the scholars were also directly present, did not have an effect on the political thought of the jurists and their view of the government. (hypothesis) After these wars, two general approaches Scholars are witnesses. The approach of Sahib Jawahar and Mulla Ahmad Naraghi explicitly emphasizes on the velayat of the public jurists and implicitly considers the way to compensate for the defeat in the war in the velayat of the jurists. The second approach, which is based on the non-entry of jurists into government positions, is manifested in the sale of Sheikh Ansari's profits. But by distancing himself from the time of the end of the wars and the dimming of the Sheikh's memories and mental experience of it, in his other books such as Qada, he gives rulings to the public administration of the jurist and deviates from his first theory.