Framing Contestation in Iran’s Hijab Policy: From the Coloniality of Power to the Third Model of Muslim Woman

Document Type : Original Article

Author

University of Tehran, Faculty of Islamic Knowledge and Thought

Abstract
This article, using a policy framing analysis, examines the issue of hijab in Iran as a case of frame contestation, in which competing meanings of womanhood, freedom, agency, and dignity are constructed and negotiated. The theoretical foundation is based on the concept of coloniality of power, revealing how Reza Shah’s forced unveiling policy established a colonial frame of the “modern woman,” where visibility became a marker of femininity and a symbol of civilizational progress. In its contemporary form, global cultural and media powers have continued to deploy this colonial frame to redefine Iranian womanhood. Drawing on recent findings in psychology and gender studies, the paper introduces de-objectification as a counter-frame to this visibility-based logic. From this perspective, objectification is not merely an individual or moral issue but a structural social process reproduced through cultural, economic, and media institutions. Its psychological and social harms – ranging from anxiety and depression to violence and family disintegration – underscore the need for systemic transformation toward a cultural order grounded in dignity, agency, and moral integrity. Finally, inspired by Ayatollah Khamenei’s notion of the “Third Model of Muslim Woman,” the paper conceptualizes de-objectification as a policy framework for reconstructing womanhood in terms of dignity and agency. It concludes that the resolution of Iran’s hijab controversy requires a structural shift from the colonial frame of freedom as visibility toward a national and moral policy of de-objectification, enabling social convergence and civilizational renewal.

Keywords


خامنه‌ای، سید علی(۱۳۹۱، ۱ خرداد).پیام به کنگره هفت هزار زن شهید کشور. پایگاه اطلاع‌رسانی دفتر حفظ و نشر آثار حضرت آیت‌الله خامنه‌ای. بازیابی از: https://farsi.khamenei.ir/message-content?id=22138
American Psychological Association, Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Bayer, R. (2008). Stigma and the ethics of public health: Not can we but should we. Social Science & Medicine, 67(3), 463–472.
Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639.
Bernard, P., Loughnan, S., Marchal, C., Godart, A., & Klein, O. (2018). The sexual objectification of women in mass media: Cross-cultural perspectives. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49(2), 239–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022117738672
Bernard, P., & Wollast, R. (2019). Why is sexualization dehumanizing? The effects of posture suggestiveness and revealing clothing on dehumanization. SAGE Open, 9(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019828230
Callaghan, K., & Schnell, F. (2005). Framing American Politics. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Calogero, R. M. (2011). Operationalizing objectification: Assessment and consequences of self-objectification. In R. M. Calogero, S. Tantleff-Dunn, & J. K. Thompson (Eds.), Self-Objectification in Women and Girls: Causes, Consequences, and Counteractions (pp. 41–71). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12304-003
Calogero, R. M. (2013). Objects don't object: Evidence that self-objectification disrupts women's social activism. Psychological Science, 24(3), 312–318.
Calogero, R. M. (2020). Toward a de-objectifying culture: A feminist psychological perspective on resistance. In S. J. Gervais (Ed.), Objectification and (De)Humanization (pp. 277–298). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40283-7_13
Calogero, R. M., & Tylka, T. L. (2014). Rejecting self-objectification: A ten-year retrospective of objectification theory. Sex Roles, 70(3–4), 311–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0391-9
Calogero, R. M., Tantleff-Dunn, S., & Thompson, J. K. (Eds.). (2011). Self-Objectification in Women and Girls: Causes, Consequences, and Counteractions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Chapman, S. (2007). Public health advocacy and tobacco control: Making smoking history. Oxford: Blackwell.
Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103–126.
Cikara, M., Eberhardt, J. L., & Fiske, S. T. (2011). From agents to objects: Sexist attitudes and neural responses to sexualized targets. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(3), 540–551. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21497
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.
Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women's lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
Fredrickson, B. L., Roberts, T., & Calogero, R. M. (2022). Objectification theory: Continuing advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 46(1), 17–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211070803
Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37.
Gill, R. (2016). Postfeminism and the new cultural life of feminism. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 19(6), 613–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549416638541
Grabe, S., Hyde, J. S., & Lindberg, S. M. (2007). Body objectification and depression in adolescents: The role of gender, appearance anxiety, and body satisfaction. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17(4), 583–602. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2007.00525.x
Gross, K., & D’Ambrosio, L. (2004). Framing emotional response. Political Psychology, 25(1), 1–29.
Harris, L. T., & Fiske, S. T. (2006). Dehumanizing the lowest of the low: Neuroimaging responses to extreme out-groups. Psychological Science, 17(10), 847–853.
Kahalon, R., & Klein, V. (2025). Self-objectification and sexuality: A systematic scoping review. The Journal of Sex Research, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2025.000000
Lakoff, G. (2004). Don't Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.
Loughnan, S., Pina, A., Vasquez, E., & Puvia, E. (2013). Sexual objectification increases rape victim blame and decreases empathy. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(4), 455–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684313485718
Loughnan, S., Haslam, N., Murnane, T., et al. (2010). Objectification leads to depersonalization: The denial of mind and moral concern to objectified others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(5), 709–717.
Moradi, B., & Huang, Y.-P. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A meta-analytic review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(4), 377–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00452.x
Nathanson, C. A. (1999). Social movements as catalysts for policy change: The case of smoking and guns. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 24(3), 421–488.
Quijano, A. (2000). Coloniality of power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America. Nepantla: Views from South, 1(3), 533–580.
Reese, S. D., Gandy, O. H., & Grant, A. E. (Eds.). (2003). Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schön, D. A., & Rein, M. (1994). Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York: Basic Books.
Szymanski, D. M., Moffitt, L. B., & Carr, E. R. (2021). Sexual objectification of women: Advances to theory and research. The Counseling Psychologist, 49(2), 252–287.
The White House. (2024, March 29). A proclamation on National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month, 2024. Washington, DC: The White House. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2024/03/29/a-proclamation-on-national-sexual-assault-awareness-and-prevention-month-2024/
Tiggemann, M. (2013). Objectification theory: Of relevance for eating disorder researchers and clinicians? Clinical Psychologist, 17(2), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/cp.12010
Tiggemann, M., & Williams, E. (2012). The role of self-objectification in disordered eating, depressed mood, and sexual functioning among women: A comprehensive test of objectification theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36(1), 66–75.
Vaes, J., et al. (2014). Seeing pain and pleasure in sexualized bodies: The neural correlates of empathy toward sexualized targets. Cortex, 64, 271–281.