Factors influencing the disagreement between the parliament and the government (a case study during the presidency of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad)

Borghei, Seyed Ali; Shirkhani, Ali; Elahi Manesh, Mohammadhasan

Factors influencing the disagreement between the parliament and the government (a case study during the presidency of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

seyed ali Borghei ¹

ali shirkhani ²

mohammadhasan elahi manesh ³

¹ PhD student, Department of Political Science, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran

² Professor, Department of Political Science, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran, Qom

³ Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran, Qom

Abstract

A scientific examination of the factors influencing the disagreements between the parliament and the government is of great importance. In the complex process of legislation and law enforcement, management style plays a significant role. It is evident that representatives draft or pass laws based on their understanding and perception of the conditions and performance of governments. The primary objective of this research is to identify the factors influencing the disagreements between the parliament and the government in the process of legislation and law enforcement, using the classic grounded theory approach. The main research question was: What are the factors influencing the disagreements between the parliament and the government during Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's presidency? Data analysis through the coding and analysis process led to the emergence of 85 codes, 11 abstract concepts, three categories, two main propositions, and seven sub-propositions. The research results indicated that the influencing factors affected the disagreements between the parliament and the government through two categories: mental models and mental processes. Mental models refer to ideology, partisan tendencies, beliefs, attitudes, and the historical perspective of the representatives, while mental processes refer to attention, self-awareness, and the analytical power of the representatives.

Keywords

Perception

Influencing Factors

Mental Models

Mental Processes

Classic Grounded Theory

افجه‌، سید علی‌اکبر(١٣٨٥). مبانی‌ فلسفی‌ و تئوریهای رهبری و رفتار سازمانی‌، تهران، انتشارات سمت‌.

بازرگان، عباس(١٣٨٧). مقدمه‌ای بر روش‌های تحقیق‌ کیفی‌ و آمیخته‌، تهران، نشر دیدآور.

حیدری، علی‌؛ سید کلالی، نادر‌(١٣٩٥). ارائه‌ مدل مزیت‌ رقابتی‌ شرکت‌های مشاوره مدیریت‌ بر اساس نظریه‌ قابلیت‌های پویا، مدیریت‌ بازرگانی‌، 8(2)، 317-338.

شیروانی، محمد(1400). عملیات روانی در شبکه‌های اجتماعی، تهران: چاپ اول، نشر آرما.

مرتضوی، لیلا، شیخی نژاد، فاطمه(1396). بازنمایی محتوا و ساختار ذهن انسان: مبانی نظری و فرایند اجرایی نقشه شناختی. روش‌شناسی علوم انسانی، 23(91)، 127-149.

مطهری، مرتضی‌(١٣٧٩). فلسفه‌ تاریخ‌، انتشارات صدرا.

میکائیلی، نیلوفر، اسمعیلی، معصومه(1395). مقایسه نظریه ذهن و کارکرد اجرایی در دانش‌آموزان دارای ناتوانی یادگیری و عادی، روانشناسی افراد استثنای، 21(6)، 81-100.

ویلارد آلپورت؛ گردون، پستمن، لئو(1374). روانشناسی شایعه، ترجمه، ساعد دبستانی، چاپ دوم، تهران: انتشارات سروش.

ویلیامز، کوین(1397). درک تئوری رسانه، ترجمه رحیم قاسمیان، تهران: نشر ساقی.

"Neurocognitive Mechanisms Underlying Value- Based Decision Making: from Core Values to Economic Value", Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 398.

Schneider, S. C. and R. Angelmar (1993). "Cognition in Organizational Analysis: Who's Minding the Store", Organization Siudies, 14(3).

Duckitt, J. (2001). "A Dual-Process Cognitive-Motivational Theory of Ideology and Prejudice", In M. P. Zanna (Ed.) , Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 33. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Glaser, B. (1992). Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis, Mill Valley, CA Sociology Press.

(2005). The Grounded Theory Perspective III: Theoretical Coding, Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA.

Gregory, Richard (2000). Perception, Zangwill. Humans Use Summary Statistics to Perceive Auditory Sequences", Psy-chological Science, 22.

Hamilton, D. L., N. Way, S. J. Sherman and E. Percy (2013). "Convergence and

Hershey, G. and J. Lugo (1970). Living Psychology, New York, MacMillan Company. 24.

Kelly, M. (2000). "New Historicism", Amsterdam. AUP.

Laibson, D. (1997). "Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2).

Piazza, E. A., T. D. Sweeny, D. Wessel, M. A. Silver and D. Whitney (2013). "Humans Use

Pomerantz, R. (2003). "Perception: Overview", In: Lynn Nadel (Ed.) , Encyclopedia of

Adams, R. B., N. Ambady, K. Nakayama and S. Shimojo (2011). The Science of Social Vision, New York, Oxford University Press.

Alan, S. and J. Gary (2011). "Perception, Attribution, and Judgment of Others". Organizational Behaviour, 21(6).

Altemeyer, R. A. (1998). "The other "Authoritarian Personality", In M. P. Zanna (Ed.) , Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 30, New York: Academic Press.

Bazerman, M., and D. Moore (2013). Judgment in Managerial Decision Making, (8th ed.) , John Wiley and Sons.

Braithwaite, V. (1994). "Beyond Rokeachs Equality-freedom Model: tow Dimensional Value in a One Dimensional World", Journal of Social Issues, 50. 10. Brosch, T. and D. Sander (2013).

Bullock, John G. (2011). "Elite Influence on Public Opinion in an Informed Electorate", American Political Science Review 105(3).

Colin, F. Camerer (2009). "Progress in Behavioral Game Theory", Journal of Economic Perspectives 11(4).

Costa-Gomes, M., V. P. Crawford and B. Broseta (2010). "Cognition and Behaviorin Normal-Form Games: An Experimental Study", Econometrica 69 (5). 14. Crane, Tim (2005). "The Problem of Perception"", Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Accessed 1.9.2010.

Rubinstein, A. (2003). "Economics and Psychology? The Case of Hyperbolic Discounting", International Economic Review 44(4).

Saks, A. M. and B. E. Ashforth (2011). "Organizational Socialization: Making Sense of the Past and Present as a Prologue for the Future", Journal of Vocational Behavior, 51.

Tetlock. Philip E. (1984) "Cognitive Style and Political Belief Systems in the British House of Commons", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 46, No. 2.

Thaler, Richard H. and R. Sunstein Cass (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisionsabout Health, Wealth and Happiness, Penguin.

Waytz, A., K. Gray, N. Epley and D. M. Wegner (2010). "Causes and Consequences of Mind Perception", Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

Weiss, Joseph W. (2001). Organizational Behavior and Change Managing Diversity, Cross Cultural Dynamics and Ethics, South-western College Publishing.

Zebrowitz, L. A. and J. M. Montepare (2006). "The Ecological Approach to Person Perception: Evolutionary Roots and Contemporary Offshoots", New York: Psychology Press, 20(1).