scientific journal Political Sociology of the Islamic Revolution

Abstract Good (desirable) governance has been the focus of social science researchers in the last three decades. According to the latest definition of the World Bank, good governance is crystallized in the adoption of predictable, open and explicit government policies (transparency of government activities); In a report, this global center investigated the effects of unfavorable governance on the delay in economic growth of developing countries; And in this report, which is caused by concerns related to the relationship between development, democracy and various social issues, he raised the concept of good governance; And the results of the report are based on the fact that weakness in applying and implementing the principles of good governance is one of the most important obstacles to growth and development in countries. According to the basic principles of good governance, one of the most important contemporary and new theories that has a high ability to realize them; The theory of polyarchy is Robert Dahl; Based on this, this qualitative research with the method of examining correlations between variables seeks to answer the question: What relationship can be established between the political structure of the Islamic Republic of Iran and the indicators of "good governance" with Robert Dahl's theory of polyarchy? Based on this, the relationship between good governance and Robert Dahl's polyarchy is a direct relationship.

Abstract The issue of guiding man and bringing him to happiness has been one of the goals of divine prophets; This is the basis of the call to monotheism, prophethood and the introduction of the next prophet in divine religions and Imamate in Islam, resurrection, their tidings and warnings to realize this goal and great ideal. He sent the perfect man to lead mankind to happiness and perfection and placed him as his guardian on earth and this path was current in all religions until he reached the religion of Islam and with the end of prophethood, the imamate continued the goal of the prophets for the happiness of man. and reason dictates that the successors of the divine ambassadors should be the people most similar to them, who were appointed as successors based on the Shia view, the twelve imams, and in the age of occult jurisprudence, based on reason and religious texts. In contrast to the opinion of the Sunnis, they believed in the theory of election, that they believed in the Shura for election. Mr. Shamsuddin is one of those who accepted this opinion and cited the verses of the Shura to prove it. Emphasis on the thoughts of Imam Khomeini (RA) has examined the implications of his evidence and the legal authority in the age of occultation using the opinions of Imam Khomeini (RA) has proved that he also rejected the Shura theory and at the same time did not ignore

Abstract Religious democracy is a political theory based on the two principles of God and people, but at the same time it is not theocracy or democracy. Rulers in a theocracy are considered to be appointed by God, enforce His law, and answerable only to Him, while in a democracy they rule according to the will of the majority of the people. The main research question is, what is the position of God and people in the religious democratic system based on the principles of the constitution? In response, data and documents are collected and analyzed with a descriptive-analytical approach and library tools. According to the results of this research, based on the principles of the constitution, religious democracy is based on both the foundation of God and the people, the political will of the people is defined during the absolute sovereignty of God, and the laws of God, chosen by the majority of the people, form the framework of the political system, and in that people They are in control of their destiny on behalf of God, and those in charge are accountable both to the people and to God.

Abstract The present study was conducted with the aim of investigating the effectiveness of political participation in modern democracy in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Modern democracy is considered one of the main parts of political life in most countries of the world today, and it is one of the pillars of democracy. It can play an important role in the participation and supervision of citizens on the performance and decisions of political system workers, the parliament and the parliamentary system and its special role in various countries in the affairs of elections and in the Islamic Republic, hence this question has been raised. Is it possible to consider whether political participation can have a significant impact in modern democracy or not? The main purpose of this article is to explore political participation in modern democracy and in the system of the Islamic Republic of Iran, so it can be said that one of the main axes of the process of political developments, especially in countries, especially in Iran, from the constitution .It has been the desire for democracy, in the conditions of democracy, it has been associated as one of the theoretical and important problems of Iranian intellectual-political currents, including socialism, Islamist and liberalism, and these currents speak of the value and desirability of democracy. In this regard, democracy is the result of popular legitimacy and popular and institutional participation based on law and legality and controlled and under the supervision of legal authority and includes political diversity and plurality.

Abstract Tunisia was the first country in which a new wave of Islamic awakening began in its region in 2010, and with the removal of Ben Ali from the government, it marked a new wave of developments in the region under the name of fighting against tyranny and seeking democracy. In fact, the most important demands of the people in this period of Islamic awakening; It was the desire for democracy and the removal of tyranny and dictatorship, which is similar to the Iranian Islamic Revolution in February 1357. The most important question is: What were the results of the wave of Islamic awakening (2011) following the demand for democracy influenced by various forces in Tunisia? And its realization is affected by various Islamic and secular forces and currents in Tunisia, and of course its influence by the Islamic Revolution of Iran is desired (goal). The findings of the article show that the wave of Islamic awakening and democratization in Tunisia with the leadership of Hezb-al-Nehza influenced by the Islamic Revolution of Iran has had better results in creating a pluralistic society and the isolation of tyranny than in other countries. Searching for democracy in this country has a more suitable perspective (findings). Using the analytical descriptive method and referring to library and documentary sources is used in this article to write the content (method).

Abstract Religious democracy has emerged as a novel concept in the political and cultural space of our society and has presented itself as a political philosophy and a special and independent model of government, as opposed to political philosophies and alternative models of government, especially secularism and fundamentalism. The main claim of religious democracy in Iran is that without a purely materialistic view of customary, humanistic, individualistic and commercial principles; A popular government can be established, but based on religious values ​​and within the framework of divine commandments. In fact, the main point of the research is that so far no serious attempt has been made to compare the three types of alternative political systems (religious democracy, secularism and fundamentalism) in order to show their differences or possibly some similarities. In this article, using a descriptive-analytical method based on logical reasoning, we make a comparative comparison between religious democracy and secularism and fundamentalism in order to enumerate their differences and commonalities, components and indicators of democracy. Let us also explain religion.

Abstract One of the most important ways to achieve development is the participation of all members of society, and this is possible through the establishment of desirable and just social relations. Women's political participation is one of the important issues that is an important indicator in the process of sustainable development of any society. The more humane and just society has social relations, the more and better the participation and cooperation of individuals. In fact, disability participation is the structure and function of social relations and the distribution of facilities, resources, division of labor and responsibilities in society. Changes and developments that have occurred in recent decades in the political and social field of women in Iran, increasing the level of education, participation in various social, political and economic fields and in general their efforts to gain different roles in society show the activation of the role Women are in different fields. However, it can be seen that the presence and participation of women in senior management has serious problems. In the meantime, the question arises whether the victory of the Islamic Revolution had an effect on the quality of women's political participation? What are the barriers to women's political participation? The results show that the teachings of the Islamic Revolution emphasize on independence, oppression, social justice and gender justice, and these concepts have played a key role in women's equitable participation and less attention has been paid to independent participation. The traditional structure and texture that is woven into the fabric of thought and thought of the people of the society is influenced by the political culture of the Iranian society and seems to be a serious obstacle to the realization of women's rights and participation.