Document Type : Original Article

Author

Assistant Professor, Department of Theology, Islamic Jurisprudence and Law, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Each actor in the field of international relations has a specific framework and model and a defined internal logic for his activity in the field of foreign policy. In this article, an attempt has been made to examine the important question of what are the components of political jurisprudence in the field of foreign policy and how can the effects of these components be analyzed in foreign policy based on the statement of the second step of the Islamic revolution? The following article is descriptive and analytical and has investigated the mentioned question using the library method. The findings indicate that political jurisprudence is a defining model in the form of political Islam, which has been proposed as an Islamic theory in international relations. Basically, political jurisprudence is also defined as the answers of religion to the political problems of society. Therefore, in the political society formed after the revolution, in the framework of the Islamic government, foreign policy is influenced by the components of political jurisprudence in this field. The principle of negation of the mustache, central justice, support for the weak, independence and self-sufficiency, and distrust of enemies are among the most important components of political jurisprudence in foreign policy. The effects of the mentioned components are anti-arrogance and confrontation with the unipolar system, demarcation with the enemy, defense of liberation movements and axis of resistance, issuing the Islamic revolution and supporting Islamic awakening, international pacifism, anti-arrogance and preserving independence, not fearing threats from enemies.

Keywords